I have a question and I hope it will not engender those ubiquitous debates about whether chromatic dulcimers are real dulcimers.
My daughter is 5 years old, and we are about to start piano lessons for her. But she also sees me playing guitar, mandolin, autoharp, dulcimer, ukulele, and basically anything with strings that you pluck or strum. She saw a picture of one of David Beede's Eedy Beede octave dulcimers and has asked for one. Since I also find those instruments irresistible, I am inclined to get one.
But the question is, should it be a standard diatonic (with the 6+ fret) or should I go chromatic. Keep in mind that my goal right now is simply my daughter's musical development.
On the one hand, the diatonic fretboard will make it easier for her to pick out the melodies of all those kids songs she already knows. On the other hand, she does sing some complicated stuff already, and once she starts playing the piano, she will not be limited to the diatonic scale. I don't want her to lose interest in the dulcimer because it lacks the notes she wants to play.
I am not trying to create a musical genius here. I want my daughter to benefit from the increased ability for abstract thinking that musical instruction at a young age engenders, and, of course, to develop a love of music, something that has given my life enjoyment and meaning even if after decades of playing instruments I am still but a mediocre amateur.
So the question comes down to this: would the limitations of a diatonic fretboard stimulate or discourage my daughter's interest in music?
Any thoughts?


